anyone done any testing between k&n and itg panel filter

[1.8tizzle]

im curious, i need hard data.  don hook it up, or raman, somebody.

[ricerocket]

Honestly, the difference is so miniscule, I'd go with whatever you can find more easily.  Some complain about K&N oils fouling up their MAF, so maybe that's a reason to go ITG?

[1.8tizzle]

:thumbup1:

[Don®]

Well when it does come to panel filters I think there have been a few that have posted results where the g/s gained were very miniscule.

If we're talking about a filter on a stick then I'd stick with K&N...they've been around the longest...really they're all the same.

[AVANT]

I've have the ITG panel in the stock airbox and a ITG cone with from the eurosport short ram and I'm quite impressed at the condition of the MAF. I haven't compared it to a K&N equiv though.

[Bastard]

most of these tests are with k03s. And I have doubts that the k03 can really significantly tax the stock airbox enough for these filter tests to be meaningful

[groftja]

Yeah I agree with what you said based on all of the tests I've seen.  Plus the pipes and all the changes in airflow direction are the big nasty anyway.

[AllofurVWRbelong2me]

I'd grab a K&N, go with the guys who have been doing it for the longest.  :thumbup1:

[Matt]

yeah id say k&n.  theres a reason theyve been around so long.